Lost in Translation?

My journey into international literature recently passed the two-month mark, and I’ve been taking stock of many lessons in a short time span.  I began with a simple premise: not enough women authors are translated into English, and those who are deserve more attention.  Though I organize the site by language and country categories and tags for readers, I approach authors as individuals rather than national representatives.  But there’s an issue I haven’t addressed: What happens when it doesn’t work?  What if a translation is an acclaimed international bestseller, but still feels like a misfire?  I encountered this dilemma last week with Jen Calleja’s translation of Marion Poschmann’s The Pine Islands.

At first glance, The Pine Islands seemed promising.  Widely celebrated as German author Marion Poschmann’s first work to appear in English translation, it ascended to the short list of the Man Booker International Prize last spring.  When I began reading, its whimsical elements proved an appealing, mildly humorous draw.  Gilbert Sylvester, an academic who specializes in the “representation of beards in film,” dreams that his wife is cheating on him.  While many people might simply go about their day after this experience, he picks a fight with her, abruptly leaves home, and flies to Japan.  The novel coupled a satirical approach to western academia with a common fantasy: What if I don’t go to work or home today, but just keep going until I end up somewhere else?

The narrative’s problems start when Sylvester lands in Japan.  On a train platform, he inadvertently prevents a Japanese student, Yosa Tamagotchi, from commiting suicide.  Initially, authorial distance is an effective tactic, gently mocking Sylvester’s bizarre motives.  But it backfires when applied to a Japanese character, turning him into a stereotype.  Even his surname sounds like the popular 1990s toy. He’s a “petrochemistry” student who worries that “his marks [are] good, but may not be good enough” and feels a paralyzing fear of exams.  As his parents only child, he is deeply concerned about disappointing them.  Along with Sylvester, he follows the pilgrimage of haiku poet Bashō across Japan, making his transformation into cardboard Japanese sidekick complete.

Sylvester’s racism is one of his many unpleasant traits, and it illuminates the lack of character development in this strange friendship.  When Tamagotchi disagrees with him about their travel destination, he thinks to himself, “Who did this Japanese youth think he was?”  After abruptly losing track of Tamagotchi, he marvels that he cannot locate him, despite having realized that the Japanese don’t all look alike.  In stark contrast to the nuanced portrayals of the narrator and Sensei in Strange Weather in Tokyo, these gaps felt at once negligent and ignorant.

So how can we react to this novel’s surface depiction of Japanese culture?  The Asian Review of Books attributes its oversights to Poschmann’s lack of knowledge, as she wrote the novel after a three-month stay in Kyoto.  I’m inclined to agree, but also recognize the value of authors who are willing to move beyond what they know.  After all, translation always involves risk. The translator takes on a text, the publisher distributes it (sometimes at considerable financial risk), and the reader chooses a book from a different language and culture.  But the sensitivity of cultural exchange requires extra effort with both experience and research.

While The Pine Islands fell far short of the mark for me, I still think it’s worthwhile to read it, especially for dialogue about its setting and characterization. Would you be willing to read this translation?

Marion Poschmann, The Pine Islands, trans. Jen Calleja
(Serpent’s Tail, 2019)

Photo Credit: shohji, Matsushima Bay, via Pixabay.

Translating Defiance

Sweden occupies an odd space in the American imagination.  As we struggle to make ends meet, Sweden seems no less than a Scandinavian utopia: government-funded healthcare, lengthy parental leave.  Yet the Nordic Noir genre depicts the seamy underbelly of this illusion.  Think, for instance, of the psychopathic villains in Stieg Larsson’s Millennium novels or Henning Mankell’s Kurt Wallander series.

Marlaine Delargy’s translation of The Other Woman, Therese Bohman’s second novel, is a far cry from any of these stereotypes.  On one level, it takes on an old story. The narrator, a young woman who works in a hospital cafeteria, starts an affair with a married doctor.  But she recognizes the pitfalls and power dynamics of this relationship, even as she toils in a dead-end job. Portraying neither an idyllic nor a nightmarish landscape, The Other Woman embues a working-class mentality with sensitivity, refreshing what could otherwise be a stale plotline.

The narrator describes social realism as “depressing,” but a hefty dose of it defuses any illusions about Swedish life here.  Wearing an “ugly uniform,” the narrator clocks in at the cafeteria kitchen and drops “yesterday’s leftovers” into a large garbage bag.  On the bottom rung of the hospital’s “strict hierarchy,” she is a frequent target of derision.  Even as junior staff engage in petty power trips, many of her well-heeled acquaintances regard her with disgust: “…his whole bearing speaks of yachts and tennis lessons and studying abroad…I am uncomfortable in his company, because he seems uncomfortable in mine, he has the ability to make me feel judged.”  Her circumstances are more mysterious than they might appear, however.  She has attended university and is well-read, frequently alluding to Dostoevsky and other literary works.  But her working class roots trouble her, a conviction that she is “vulgar” despite “a couple of college courses.”  Her alternating feelings of shame and contempt for elitist concepts of progressivism are incisive, providing her with a unique perspective that I didn’t anticipate.

If her background is painted in shades of elusive gray, then her lover is far more straightforward—and less intriguing.  An affluent doctor with a corporate lawyer wife, he comes across as a garden-variety philanderer with dark fantasies: warning the narrator not to wear perfume or makeup in his car, insisting that she be his “little girl” and wear childish lingerie.  He pales in comparison to the women who surround him.  During this affair, she becomes fast friends with Alex, a free-spirited student who reassures her of a life beyond drudgery and insecurity.  But Alex has her own history with the doctor and an ulterior motive in maintaining this friendship.  Swept along by Alex’s revenge fantasy, the narrator could easily become a victim.  Yet she turns the fallout to her advantage, gaining a financial windfall, a new apartment in Stockholm, and a chance at a new life.  The novel ends on a note removed from existential gloom and doom, refusing to indulge in a cautionary tale about a fallen woman.

This edition of The Other Woman was released in 2015, and seems to have met the fate of many works by women in translation: middling reviews on Goodreads, a Kirkus Reviews blurb acknowledging its heavier themes, and relative obscurity.  An insightful protagonist and a fresh glimpse into Swedish literature make it worth a second look.

Therese Bohman, The Other Woman, trans Marlaine Delargy (Other Press, 2015)

Photo Credit: Pexels via Pixabay.